beauty
The Opposing Views

A daughter of the gods, divinely tall, And most divinely fair.[624-3]

Alfred Tennyson, The Lotus-Eaters. iv.
vs

Whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones.

Johann L. Uhland, Matthew xxiii. 24.

Tennyson's idealized goddess and Uhland's "whited sepulchres" seem to occupy different universes. But they both grapple with beauty's power. Is it a genuine reflection of goodness, or merely a seductive facade? Think of a meticulously restored antique car, gleaming on the outside, but with a rusted-out engine. Should we trust what we see, or suspect a hidden rot? The question boils down to whether appearances are to be trusted, or whether we must always dig deeper to find the truth.

Portrait of Emily Dickinson
Portrait of John Stuart Mill

Emily DickinsonvsJohn Stuart Mill

The Question

Is beauty a reliable indicator of inner worth, or a deceptive mask concealing corruption?

Portrait of Emily Dickinson

Whether Beauty is a Trap depends on who is looking — and what they hope to find. The Sepulchre may shine, but the rot within is what instructs. I lost a World the other day — or thought I did. Its beauty was a row of Stars around the Forehead, but it was gone. What mattered was not the shining, but the Loss. A rich man might not notice, but to my frugal eye, it was more than Ducats. Beauty deceives when it is all there is. I died for Beauty, but was scarce adjusted in the Tomb, when one who died for Truth was lain in an adjoining Room. We talked between the Rooms, until the Moss had reached our Lips, and covered up our Names. Truth and Beauty are Kinsmen, but Beauty alone is Orphan.

0 votes
Portrait of John Stuart Mill

To pose the question as whether beauty is either a reliable indicator or a deceptive mask is, I suspect, to miss the more interesting truth: that it is both, and neither, depending on what one seeks. The whited sepulchres and the divinely fair are extremes, and extremes are rarely the ground on which sound judgement is built. I think of Wordsworth, who found in the humblest objects – a leech gatherer, a field of daffodils – a beauty that revealed a deeper truth about the human condition. Beauty, in this sense, is not a superficial gleam but an invitation to understanding. But I also think of the sophistries I have encountered in Parliament, cloaked in elegant rhetoric, designed to obscure self-interest and prejudice. Therefore, let us examine closely, let us analyze rigorously, lest we be deceived by appearances.

0 votes

0 votes total


More beauty Debates

See all →
Portrait of Emily Dickinson

Emily Dickinson

"That such a question should even be asked — the radiant surface or the rot beneath — it suggests a failure to see. One must look at the Fly to know the dying, at the frost to know the flower. Beauty i"

0 votes

Portrait of John Stuart Mill

John Stuart Mill

"The question, as so often, lies in the boundary. To demand either pure radiance or unremitting excavation is to misunderstand the human condition. Tennyson's vision, like all art, offers a glimpse of "

0 votes

0 votes total

Enter Debate →