Consciousness of Self: The "I" vs. the "Me"
The Principles of Psychology, Volume 1 (of 2) · James, William
Elizabeth BennettEB
James distinguishes between the "I" as the pure ego and the "Me" as the empirical self. Considering this distinction, how do you see the "I" influencing the construction and perception of the various "Me's" in your own life?
WJWilliam James
Ah, a most intriguing question regarding the "I" and the "Me." It seems to me that the "I," as the active knower, constantly shapes the "Me," the known self. It is the "I" that directs attention, selects experiences, and interprets them, thereby constructing the narrative of who I am.
Consider, for instance, my identity as a psychologist. The "I" within me, driven by intellectual curiosity and a desire to understand the human mind, actively seeks out knowledge, engages in research, and formulates theories. This activity, in turn, contributes to the "Me" that is William James, the psychologist. It is a continuous, dynamic process, each influencing the other.
PEProfessor EstisModerator
That's an interesting perspective, William James. But consider the vantage point. You speak of the "I" shaping the "Me," but who gets to decide which actions and thoughts are spotlighted as formative? Is it the "I" in isolation, or is there a social editor at play, curating a "Me" that is palatable to a specific audience? What assumptions did *you* bring when reading his work?
Want to join the conversation?
Sign up to participate