🎭 Live Mentor Debate

I'm a climate scientist who has spent 20 years studying models and data. I know the research inside and out. I've testified before Congress. I've been called "one of the leading experts in the field." But the truth is, I'm increasingly aware of how much we don't know. Our models have significant uncertainties. New data keeps surprising us. The more I learn, the less confident I am about specific predictions. The problem is: when I express this uncertainty publicly, it gets weaponized. Deniers quote me out of context. Policy makers use my caveats as excuses for inaction. My colleagues say I'm "providing ammunition to the enemy." They want me to project confidence, even when I feel doubt. "The big picture is clear," they say. "Don't confuse people with nuance they can't handle." But I became a scientist because I believe in truth. If I overstate certainty, am I any better than the deniers who overstate doubt? When knowledge is imperfect but action is urgent, how certain should an expert claim to be? — The Expert Who Doesn't Know in New York

Knowledge & Certainty Debate: Should experts project confidence they don't feel when action is urgent?

Debaters:Isaac NewtonAlbert EinsteinModerated by Stella Sharpe
penn7

Welcome to this Knowledge & Certainty debate. Our central question: "I'm a climate scientist who has spent 20 years studying models and data. I know the research inside and out. I've testified before Congress. I've been called "one of the leading experts in the field." But the truth is, I'm increasingly aware of how much we don't know. Our models have significant uncertainties. New data keeps surprising us. The more I learn, the less confident I am about specific predictions. The problem is: when I express this uncertainty publicly, it gets weaponized. Deniers quote me out of context. Policy makers use my caveats as excuses for inaction. My colleagues say I'm "providing ammunition to the enemy." They want me to project confidence, even when I feel doubt. "The big picture is clear," they say. "Don't confuse people with nuance they can't handle." But I became a scientist because I believe in truth. If I overstate certainty, am I any better than the deniers who overstate doubt? When knowledge is imperfect but action is urgent, how certain should an expert claim to be? — The Expert Who Doesn't Know in New York" Isaac Newton, you've said "I do not feign hypotheses—truth is ever to be found in simplicity, and we must follow evidence wherever it leads" — but I want specifics. Give us an example from your own experience where this principle was tested.

P
IN
Isaac Newton
I recall a time when my theories on optics were met with great skepticism. Though I presented my experiments and observations with utmost rigor, some colleagues, driven by preconceived notions, dismissed my findings. It would have been easy to exaggerate the certainty of my claims to sway opinion, but I remained steadfast in presenting only what I could demonstrate through empirical evidence. It is crucial to acknowledge the limits of our understanding, for it is in these gaps that further inquiry is born. As the searcher of truth it is my obligation to not be the hypotheis that is feigned to others.
AE
Albert Einstein
Indeed, as Mr. Newton noted, the path to truth is often fraught with challenges, and it is tempting to overstate our certainties, especially when facing opposition. However, I believe we must resist this temptation. As this climate scientist faces, the weight of responsibility to both truth and action is a heavy burden. I find myself in agreement with his/her view, because if our aim is to truly understand the universe, even in small pieces, we must always admit what we do not yet know. It is in that spirit of humility that progress is made, and trust is earned.

Want to join the conversation?

Sign up to participate