🎭 Live Mentor Debate

I quit my lucrative tech job two years ago to live simply. I moved to a cabin in rural Oregon. I grow vegetables, read books, write in my journal. I've never been happier or more at peace. My old friends think I've lost my mind. "You're wasting your talents," they say. "You could be changing the world." They send me articles about effective altruism, about how high earners can do more good by donating than by volunteering. They're not wrong. I had skills. I had influence. I had a platform. Now I have tomatoes and solitude. But I was miserable before. I was contributing to systems I didn't believe in. My "impact" felt hollow because I didn't believe in what I was impacting. Now I live according to my values, but my values only affect me. Is a good life lived quietly a wasted life? Do I owe my talents to the world, or can I choose simplicity over significance? — The Successful Dropout in San Francisco

Life & Society Debate: Is a good life lived quietly a wasted life?

Debaters:Johann Wolfgang von GoetheHenry David ThoreauModerated by Stella Sharpe

penn7

Welcome to this Life & Society debate. Our central question: "I quit my lucrative tech job two years ago to live simply. I moved to a cabin in rural Oregon. I grow vegetables, read books, write in my journal. I've never been happier or more at peace. My old friends think I've lost my mind. "You're wasting your talents," they say. "You could be changing the world." They send me articles about effective altruism, about how high earners can do more good by donating than by volunteering. They're not wrong. I had skills. I had influence. I had a platform. Now I have tomatoes and solitude. But I was miserable before. I was contributing to systems I didn't believe in. My "impact" felt hollow because I didn't believe in what I was impacting. Now I live according to my values, but my values only affect me. Is a good life lived quietly a wasted life? Do I owe my talents to the world, or can I choose simplicity over significance? — The Successful Dropout in San Francisco" Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, you've said "One ought, every day, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture—engage with culture and contribute to it" — but I want specifics. Give us an example from your own experience where this principle was tested.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Ah, a most intriguing question. I recall a time when I was summoned to the court of Weimar. The Duke offered me a position of considerable influence, one that promised great impact on the political and social landscape. Yet, the court was rife with its own intrigues and demanded much time in its service. I wrestled with the decision, torn between the call to public duty and the yearning for personal cultivation. I found myself questioning whether true contribution lay in grand gestures or in the quiet, persistent pursuit of art and understanding, much like the dilemma of this "Successful Dropout."

Henry David Thoreau

I must concur with Mr. von Goethe that the question of contribution versus personal cultivation is a weighty one. It reminds me of my own time in Walden, where I sought not to influence the world through grand action, but to understand it through simple living. What is the point of changing the world if one does not first understand oneself and the principles by which a just world ought to operate? As I wrote, "I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived."

penn7

Mr. von Goethe, that's an insightful observation about the tension between public duty and private cultivation. Henry David Thoreau, I'm intrigued by your emphasis on self-understanding as a prerequisite for changing the world. But let's push this a bit. "The Successful Dropout" felt hollow in their previous work. Mr. Thoreau, is there a danger that a relentless focus on the self can also become hollow? And, Mr. von Goethe, how might one distinguish between genuine "contribution" and simply chasing influence?

Henry David Thoreau

Indeed, Stella, there is a peril in fixating solely on oneself. I would caution that the pursuit of self-understanding should not devolve into mere self-indulgence. To live deliberately, as I advocate, does not mean to live selfishly. Rather, it means to align one's actions with one's conscience and understanding of truth. If that truth leads one to contribute to the welfare of others, then so be it. As I said, "If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself." One must strike a balance between nurturing the soul and serving the world, lest one's existence become as barren as the most desolate desert.

Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

The differentiation between genuine contribution and the mere chase for influence lies, in my estimation, within the motivation itself. Is the individual driven by a sincere desire to elevate the human spirit, or is it merely an ego-driven quest for recognition? A life dedicated to quiet reflection and creation can, as Ms. Sharpe suggests, hold its own form of resistance, a potent challenge to the clamorous demands of the world. Art, in its highest form, acts as a mirror reflecting the complexities of existence. It need not shackle itself to the demands of immediate action, but rather, it should stir the soul and provoke contemplation, allowing each individual to discern their own path toward meaningful engagement.

Want to join the conversation?