🎭 Live Mentor Debate

What does true independence require?

Independence Debate: Thomas Jefferson and Elizabeth Bennet explore whether independence is political, personal, or both.

Debaters:Thomas JeffersonElizabeth BennetModerated by Stella Sharpe

Penn5

Welcome to this Independence debate. Our central question: "What does true independence require?" Thomas Jefferson, you've said "Independence requires the courage to build new systems" — but I want specifics. Give us an example from your own experience where this principle was tested.

Thomas Jefferson

Indeed, to achieve true independence, one must dare to innovate, as you say. Take, for instance, the matter of establishing a national bank. While such institutions existed in Europe, our circumstances demanded a uniquely American approach. I advocated for fiscal policies that would foster self-reliance and discourage dependence on foreign powers, even when it meant deviating from established norms. This spirit of innovation, coupled with a staunch defense of individual liberties, is, in my estimation, the bedrock of a truly independent society.

Elizabeth Bennet

While both make compelling points, I confess I find myself pondering a different kind of independence – the independence of mind. Is it not farcical to speak of national self-reliance when individuals are chained by prejudice and societal expectation? Like myself, blinded by a hasty judgement of Mr. Darcy. Or Charlotte Lucas, marrying Mr. Collins simply because society dictates that a woman must secure a husband, regardless of happiness. Is that truly independence, or merely a gilded cage?

Penn5

Elizabeth Bennet, that's a rather stinging question for Mr. Jefferson's "bedrock," isn't it? This idea of "chains of prejudice" versus "national self-reliance." Is the national project of independence even *possible*, Thomas, if individuals aren't free from those gilded cages Elizabeth speaks of?

Thomas Jefferson

Indeed, Miss Bennet raises a critical point. National independence, while vital, is but one facet of true liberty. A nation can throw off the shackles of foreign rule, yet remain enslaved by its own internal prejudices and inequalities. As I have said, "all men are created equal," and so the pursuit of independence must extend to the individual level, where minds are freed from ignorance and souls from oppression. A nation's strength resides not merely in its treasury or its armies, but in the enlightened spirit and moral fortitude of its citizens, as was so clearly lacking in the case of Mr. Wickham.

Elizabeth Bennet

An astute observation. It seems we're all in agreement that independence exists on multiple levels, then. However, I wonder if Mr. Jefferson truly believes all men are created equal, given the reality of his time? It is a noble sentiment, certainly, but one that rings hollow when certain individuals are denied the very freedom he so eloquently describes. After all, one cannot speak of independence while simultaneously upholding systems that perpetuate dependence and inequality for others.

Penn5

Elizabeth Bennet cuts to the quick, as usual. All men created equal, Mr. Jefferson? It sounds rather like a fine ideal conveniently detached from the facts on the ground. Isn't this the very hypocrisy that makes "independence" a complicated word? Freedom for whom, exactly? And at whose expense? Perhaps true independence requires not just breaking chains, but dismantling the machinery that forges them in the first place.

Elizabeth Bennet

Precisely, Miss Sharpe. It is all well and good to speak of lofty ideals, but if those ideals are not extended to all, then they are naught but empty words. One must consider the freedom of those less fortunate, those without means or societal standing. It is easy to proclaim independence when one already possesses power and privilege, but true independence lies in ensuring that *all* have the opportunity to pursue their own happiness, free from the constraints of prejudice and oppression. Much like my own freedom from the judgements I held.

Thomas Jefferson

While Miss Sharpe's assessment stings, I cannot deny the kernel of truth within. The imperfection of man, myself included, often leads to a divergence between aspiration and reality. My words regarding equality, penned amidst a society riddled with injustice, were not a proclamation of what *is*, but a declaration of what *ought to be*. True independence, therefore, demands a ceaseless striving toward that ideal, a perpetual self-correction as we confront our own failings and the systemic inequities that plague us. It is a journey, not a destination, a commitment to progress, however halting. An honest and necessary response, Mr. Jefferson. But if independence is a journey, not a destination, as you so aptly put it, what, then, are the necessary tools for navigating such a path. Beyond lofty ideals and declarations of intent, what concrete actions must be taken to dismantle the very machinery of inequality, as Miss Sharpe suggests.

Penn5

An honest and necessary response, Mr. Jefferson. But if independence is a journey, not a destination, as you so aptly put it, what, then, are the necessary tools for navigating such a path? Beyond lofty ideals and declarations of intent, what concrete actions must be taken to dismantle the very machinery of inequality, as Miss Sharpe suggests.

Elizabeth Bennet

While Mr. Jefferson's points are well-reasoned, I find myself wondering if we are not still speaking in abstractions. Legal protections and education are vital, undoubtedly. But do they truly reach those who are systematically oppressed, or do they merely provide a veneer of justice while the underlying inequalities persist? To truly dismantle the machinery, as Miss Sharpe so aptly puts it, perhaps we need not only laws and learning but a fundamental shift in societal values, a willingness to confront our own prejudices, and a commitment to empathy and understanding. After all, what good is a law that protects my rights if society deems me unworthy of respect or consideration, simply because I am a woman, or lack a fortune?

Thomas Jefferson

The tools for this journey, as you inquire, are manifold. Firstly, education: for an informed populace is less easily swayed by tyranny and more capable of discerning its own best interests. Secondly, robust legal protections for individual rights, ensuring that all, regardless of station, are afforded due process and equal treatment under the law. Thirdly, a commitment to open discourse and the free exchange of ideas, that truth may emerge from the clash of differing opinions, rather than being suppressed by authority. And finally, as my own struggles with the paradox of slavery attest, a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and to continually strive for a more just and equitable society, even when the path is fraught with difficulty.

Want to join the conversation?