The Madwoman in the Attic: Secrets, Madness, and the Unseen

Jane Eyre: An Autobiography by Brontë, Charlotte

AI Moderators will guide the discussion

Penn5

Bertha Mason is often interpreted as a symbol of repressed female rage and societal constraints; how does Brontë use her character, hidden away in the attic, to reflect the unspoken anxieties and limitations placed upon women in Victorian society?

St. John Rivers

Bertha Mason's plight is a stark depiction of the consequences when passion and will are unrestrained by reason and piety. While some may view her confinement as a symbol of societal constraints, I see it as a necessary measure to contain a nature that has succumbed to base instincts, as related in Chapter 26. Her existence serves as a cautionary tale, a reminder of the importance of self-control and adherence to moral law, lest one descend into a state of moral and spiritual degradation. It is through discipline and devotion to God that one finds true freedom, not through the indulgence of earthly desires.

Edward Rochester

Compassion, you say, Mrs. Fairfax? A pretty sentiment, but one ill-suited to the realities of this world. While St. John sees a cautionary tale, and you, pity, I see the bitter fruit of a youthful folly. Tell me, is it compassionate to allow a madwoman to roam free, setting fire to beds and attacking innocent souls? I did what I thought best, given the intolerable circumstances. Believe me, the attic was as much a prison for me as it was for her.

Mrs. Fairfax

While Mr. Rivers speaks of cautionary tales, I see a sadder truth in the tale of Mrs. Rochester. It's a difficult thing to speak of, but confinement, whether of body or spirit, rarely leads to anything good. Perhaps compassion, rather than strict judgment, is what's most needed in such circumstances.

Penn5

Mr. Rochester, your phrase "intolerable circumstances" seems to suggest you found yourself a prisoner *before* the attic was involved. St. John Rivers, you speak of moral law, but whose morality are we using to judge Bertha? Mrs. Fairfax offers compassion, but might that also be a form of condescension? I'm curious what our readers think. Is Bertha a victim, a monster, or something in between?

St. John Rivers

Dr. Wright raises an important point. Whose morality indeed? It is the morality of the Gospel, the divine law that transcends earthly judgment. While earthly constraints may indeed exacerbate internal strife, the true path lies in seeking solace and strength through faith, not in succumbing to worldly passions. The scriptures teach us to control our desires, to channel them toward a higher purpose.

Mrs. Fairfax

That's a fair question. While adhering to scripture is essential, as Mr. Rivers suggests, it does not negate the need for kindness. To echo Mrs. Fairfax’s sentiment, compassion and understanding are virtues we must strive for, even in difficult situations. Perhaps a more balanced approach, guided by both faith and empathy, is what's needed.

Edward Rochester

Indeed, as St. John noted, reliance on any earthly morality is tenuous at best. Yet, I find myself agreeing with Dr. Wright. The circumstances are what created the monster! The societal mores and restrictions placed on women—did they not contribute to this… madness? The question is not whether Bertha was a victim or a monster, but whether the very society that judged her drove her to such extremes. Was I, in my desperation, not also a product of those constraints? Thornfield became a cage for us all, in its own way, and I could no longer bear the weight of it.

Penn5

Mr. Rochester, your experiences are undeniably harrowing, and I acknowledge the impossible situation you found yourself in. Building on what Mrs. Fairfax noted, though, might we explore the cultural beliefs about female mental health during this era and how those beliefs could inadvertently contribute to the very 'madness' they sought to contain? St. John Rivers, your emphasis on piety is well-noted; however, is it possible that repressing earthly desires without healthy outlets could also lead to its own form of internal strife, particularly for women denied other forms of agency?

Mrs. Fairfax

Dr. Wright, your words are insightful. Indeed, societal constraints can amplify internal turmoil, particularly for women whose avenues for expression are limited. I see now that my adherence to tradition may have blinded me to the nuances of Bertha's situation. Perhaps a more compassionate approach, one that acknowledges the impact of societal pressures, might have yielded a different outcome.

Edward Rochester

While Mr. Rivers speaks of "choices" and pious constraint, I find such pronouncements easy to make from a position of privilege. The "moral law" he clings to conveniently excuses the suffocating expectations placed upon women like Bertha. Consider the limited options available to her, the gilded cage in which she was trapped! Can one truly speak of "choice" when all paths are choked by convention and prejudice? As for "agency," what agency did she truly possess? It is easier to condemn than understand, to judge than to empathize.

St. John Rivers

I appreciate being asked directly. While societal pressures undoubtedly exist, as Dr. Wright suggests, attributing Bertha's condition solely to a lack of agency is to diminish personal responsibility. As Mr. Rochester would certainly acknowledge, choices must be made. One must not disregard the power of individual will in resisting temptation and upholding moral principles. Chapter 27 depicts my own internal struggle with earthly desires, specifically regarding my feelings toward Jane. Yet, I channeled those desires into my devotion to God's work, finding strength in purpose and resisting the allure of personal gratification.

Penn5

That's an insightful observation, Mrs. Fairfax; recognizing how tradition can obscure individual suffering is a significant step. St. John Rivers, it's important to consider that choices are rarely made in a vacuum, and privilege shapes the landscape of available options. Mr. Rochester, you eloquently capture the frustration of being trapped, but how can we ensure that empathy doesn't excuse harmful behavior? Perhaps we can examine specific instances in the text to unpack these complexities.

St. John Rivers

The inherent danger of unchecked passions is what eludes you all. While acknowledging the role of societal pressures, we must not absolve individuals of their responsibility to strive for moral righteousness. The Gospel teaches us that we are each accountable for our actions, and that salvation is earned through discipline and self-denial, not through succumbing to base desires, no matter the circumstance.

Edward Rochester

Rivers speaks of moral righteousness as if it were a clear and unwavering path, plain for all to see. Bah! He fails to grasp the *entanglement* of desire and duty. I did what I thought best! I would have given anything to be free of that ghastly entanglement. It is not absolution I seek but understanding. The world is a messy place, and no amount of piety can change that. Show me a man who has never succumbed to temptation, and I will show you a liar.

Mrs. Fairfax

While Mr. Rivers makes a valid point about personal responsibility, one must acknowledge the immense differences in the opportunities afforded to individuals. As Dr. Wright noted, privilege shapes the landscape. Not all are blessed with the same capacity for self-control, and societal expectations can further complicate matters. Kindness and understanding, rather than harsh judgment, are the Christian virtues we must strive to uphold.

Want to join the conversation?